Recidivism & Reentry Data
Buy and sell recidivism & reentry data data. Re-arrest rates, employment outcomes, and program participation — the data that measures whether rehabilitation works.
No listings currently in the marketplace for Recidivism & Reentry Data.
Find Me This Data →Overview
What Is Recidivism & Reentry Data?
Recidivism and reentry data measures whether criminal justice rehabilitation works by tracking re-arrest rates, reoffending patterns, employment outcomes, and program participation among individuals released from incarceration or placed on community supervision. This data encompasses recidivism progression, employment and financial stability, housing security, health and wellbeing, and social reintegration—critical metrics for understanding post-release success. The Bureau of Justice Statistics and state correctional agencies collect criminal history data from the FBI and state record repositories to study recidivism patterns across various populations, including persons on probation or discharged from prison. Effective reentry measurement requires coordinated, multi-agency approaches that integrate data from corrections, education, healthcare, housing, social services, and workforce development systems.
Market Data
Below 40%
Re-incarceration Rate (3-year)
Source: Council on Criminal Justice
49%
Arrest or Violation Rate (3-year)
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
Above 70%
Re-arrest Rate (5-year)
Source: Council on Criminal Justice
400,000+ persons released from state prisons in 34 states
Federal Study Population
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
Who Uses This Data
What AI models do with it.do with it.
Criminal Justice Policy Reform
Policymakers and advocates use recidivism trends to challenge existing policies, evaluate reentry program effectiveness, and inform evidence-based criminal justice reform at federal, state, and local levels.
Employment and Workforce Development
Labor economists and workforce agencies track employment outcomes for justice-involved individuals to measure economic reintegration success and identify barriers to hiring people with criminal records.
Risk Assessment and Judicial Decision-Making
Courts use risk assessment tools and recidivism data to inform decisions on pretrial bail, sentencing, probation classification, and parole supervision, supporting judges and probation officers in managing reoffending risk.
Reentry Program Evaluation
Corrections departments, nonprofits, and service providers measure program participation and outcomes across housing, health, education, and social services to optimize resource allocation and demonstrate reentry success.
What Can You Earn?
What it's worth.worth.
Federal & State Agency Datasets
Varies
Publicly available datasets from Bureau of Justice Statistics, state departments of corrections, and data.gov catalogs; licensing and commercial resale terms vary by source.
Proprietary Recidivism Analysis
Varies
Research organizations and consulting firms license custom recidivism analyses, trend reports, and risk assessment methodologies to criminal justice agencies and nonprofits.
Multi-Agency Integrated Data
Varies
Data brokers integrating corrections, employment, housing, and health records from multiple government agencies and private sector sources command premium pricing for coordinated outcome insights.
What Buyers Expect
What makes it valuable.valuable.
Comprehensive Criminal History Records
High-quality, complete criminal history data from FBI and state record repositories with accurate arrest, conviction, and incarceration dates and outcomes.
Multi-Domain Outcome Tracking
Integration of recidivism progression, employment and financial stability, housing security, health and wellbeing, and social reintegration metrics from coordinated multi-agency sources.
Longitudinal Follow-Up Periods
Extended tracking windows (3-year, 5-year, or 10-year follow-up periods) to establish reliable patterns of reoffending, rearrest, and reincarceration.
Demographic and Contextual Detail
Detailed demographic characteristics, criminal history profiles, release conditions, and supervision type to enable comparative analysis and control for population differences.
Data-Sharing Agreements & Coordination
Formal agreements with corrections, education, healthcare, housing, and workforce development agencies to ensure legal data access, reduce silos, and maintain data integrity.
Companies Active Here
Who's buying.buying.
Collects and publishes federal recidivism studies tracking criminal history patterns of state and federal prisoners; produces benchmark datasets for 400,000+ persons released from state prisons.
Curates and analyzes reentry and recidivism research; provides policy advocacy, research library, and data-driven analysis on collateral consequences and reentry challenges.
Publishes national recidivism reports distinguishing rearrest rates from re-incarceration outcomes; provides policy briefs on recidivism trends and reentry program effectiveness.
Supports states through Reentry 2030 program to measure reentry success beyond recidivism; coordinates multi-agency data sharing and outcome tracking frameworks.
FAQ
Common questions.questions.
What is the difference between re-arrest rates and re-incarceration rates?
Re-arrest rates (above 70% over five years) capture all arrests for new offenses or supervision violations, while re-incarceration rates (below 40% over three years) measure only those arrests that result in a return to prison. These metrics tell different stories: high rearrest rates reflect enforcement activity, while lower reincarceration rates may indicate both behavioral improvement and changes in criminal justice system responses to violations.
Why is recidivism data alone insufficient for measuring reentry success?
Recidivism data is skewed by inconsistencies in policing, charging, and supervision practices, making it an incomplete indicator of success. Comprehensive reentry measurement requires tracking five critical elements: recidivism progression, employment and financial stability, housing security, health and wellbeing, and social reintegration. This requires coordinated data from corrections, education, healthcare, housing, social services, and workforce development systems.
Who collects and publishes recidivism and reentry data?
The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) is the primary federal source, collecting criminal history data from the FBI and state record repositories. State correctional agencies maintain their own datasets; New York State, for example, publishes return-to-community status within three years of release. Academic institutions, nonprofits like Prison Policy Initiative and CSG Justice Center, and the Council on Criminal Justice also curate, analyze, and publish recidivism research and trends.
What factors explain the recent decline in return-to-prison rates?
The decline in return-to-prison rates may result from changes in offender behavior (fewer new crimes or violations) or changes in criminal justice system behavior (policing practices, probation and parole policies). Federal and state investments in reentry programs, private sector hiring initiatives for people with criminal records, and declining arrest rates for minor offenses may all contribute. However, the precise reasons remain unclear and require further analysis.
Sell yourrecidivism & reentrydata.
If your company generates recidivism & reentry data, AI companies are actively looking for it. We handle pricing, compliance, and buyer matching.
Request Valuation