Defense Contract Award Data
Buy and sell defense contract award data data. Contract values, awardees, and performance ratings — the competitive intelligence for defense procurement.
No listings currently in the marketplace for Defense Contract Award Data.
Find Me This Data →Overview
What Is Defense Contract Award Data?
Defense Contract Award Data provides competitive intelligence on federal defense procurement, including contract values, awardee information, and performance metrics. This data covers awards across the Department of Defense and related agencies, tracking billions in annual spending across traditional primes like Lockheed Martin and Boeing, as well as emerging non-traditional contractors in advanced technologies. The market encompasses procurement across multiple domains—air, land, naval, and space—with growing emphasis on modernization, AI capabilities, and networked systems. Access to contract award data enables stakeholders to monitor market trends, identify emerging competitors, track awardee performance, and understand shifting procurement priorities. The defense contracting landscape is undergoing structural transformation, with accelerating demand for software-defined systems, AI/ML capabilities, and non-traditional defense tech firms capturing expanding market share alongside legacy platform providers.
Market Data
$344.2 billion
DoD Contract Obligations (FY2025 trailing 12 months)
Source: PrimeRFP SCOUT
$521 billion
Pentagon Procurement (FY2025)
Source: Bloomberg Government
$28.3 billion
Top 10 Federal Contract Awards (March 2026)
Source: Fed-Spend
$743.39 billion
Global Defense Contracting Service Market (2026)
Source: Research and Markets
$44.2 billion (5,945 contracts)
Lockheed Martin FY2025 DoD Awards
Source: PrimeRFP SCOUT
Who Uses This Data
What AI models do with it.do with it.
Competitive Intelligence for Contractors
Defense primes and non-traditional contractors monitor competitor awards, track market share shifts, and identify emerging opportunities in AI, electronic warfare, and modernization programs.
Government Procurement Analysis
Federal agencies and policy analysts track spending patterns, awardee performance, and procurement trends to inform budgeting, strategy, and supplier evaluation.
Investment & M&A Due Diligence
Private equity, venture capital, and corporate development teams assess target companies' defense contract portfolios, pipeline value, and market positioning.
Supply Chain & Risk Management
Subcontractors and suppliers track prime awardees, contract values, and performance ratings to identify partnership opportunities and assess customer financial health.
Pricing depends on the proposed terms
We do not have a verified, comparable price for your dataset. Consider the permitted uses, license term, exclusivity, provenance, coverage and quality. A seller asking price is a proposal, not an appraisal or guaranteed sale. Compare prices only when the source, date, currency, unit and license scope are known.
What Buyers Expect
What makes it valuable.valuable.
Timeliness & Accuracy
Contract data must reflect official federal procurement records (FPDS filings, contract action summaries) with minimal lag; values must be precise and sourced from government databases.
Comprehensive Coverage
Data should span all major awardees, contract types (fixed-price, cost-plus, IDIQ), and program domains (air, land, naval, space, AI/ML, modernization); both large primes and emerging non-traditional contractors.
Performance & Context Metrics
Beyond award values, buyers seek awardee performance ratings, contract completion history, and strategic context (e.g., technical focus, customer concentration, market position shifts).
Segmentation & Filtering
Data must be segmentable by customer agency, contract type, technology domain, awardee category (traditional vs. non-traditional), and value range for targeted competitive analysis.
Potential applications and organizations
Who's buying.buying.
Largest DoD contractor by obligation; $44.2 billion in awards across 5,945 contracts in FY2025 trailing period, dominant in traditional platform development and modernization.
Second-largest DoD awardee; $17.7 billion in FY2025 obligations across 3,860 contracts, focused on C4ISR, electronic warfare, and advanced defense systems.
Non-traditional defense tech contractors capturing outsized share of new awards; driving market shift toward software-defined systems, AI, and rapid integration capabilities.
Emerging AI capability providers; awarded up to $200 million individual contracts by Pentagon's Chief Digital and AI Office for advanced AI solutions addressing national security challenges.
FAQ
Common questions.questions.
Where does defense contract award data come from?
Contract award data originates from federal procurement records, primarily the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) and official Department of Defense contract action summaries. The Pentagon implements a 90-day reporting delay for national security reasons, so data typically becomes publicly available quarterly. Commercial providers aggregate, analyze, and enhance this data with performance metrics and competitive context.
What is driving demand for defense contract data right now?
Three major factors are accelerating demand: military modernization initiatives requiring updated capabilities, the structural shift from platform-centric to networked software-defined systems compressing decision cycles, and the rapid emergence of non-traditional defense contractors (tech firms, startups) disrupting the legacy prime contractor landscape. Companies need intelligence to track competitor positioning and identify new market entrants.
How much can non-traditional contractors expect to win?
Non-traditional contractors like Anduril and Palantir are capturing a disproportionately large share of new awards in advanced technology categories (AI/ML, electronic warfare, digital modernization). In March 2026 alone, $28.3 billion in top contract awards showed defense tech dominating, though exact future award volumes depend on program demand signals and contractor readiness to meet Pentagon's data discipline and integration requirements.
What metrics should I track to assess contract opportunity?
Focus on contract type (IDIQ vehicles vs. fixed obligations), awardee obligation history (concentration risk), customer agency (DoD vs. civilian), technology domain (AI, C4ISR, vehicles, unmanned systems), and award trend direction (growth or decline by category). Track non-traditional contractor penetration and consolidation patterns among traditional primes, as both signal shifting procurement strategy and emerging competitive threats.
Sell yourdefense contract awarddata.
Describe your defense contract award data and the uses you are authorized to offer. Price, legal suitability, and buyer interest require separate evaluation. No match or sale is guaranteed.
Prepare a Listing